FOCA Watch: Now We Can Close Our Eyes

From the president:

Now, the Freedom of Choice Act is not highest legislative priority. I believe that women should have the right to choose. But I think that the most important thing we can do to tamp down some of the anger surrounding this issue is to focus on those areas that we can agree on. And that’s — that’s where I’m going to focus.

Time for the Republicans to find another sacred … er, cash cow. Good thing gay marriage has come along, eh? Or not. Let’s shift the watch from FOCA and focus instead on the predictable blogosphere denial: This was nothing more than spin … FOCA will wait until his SECOND term … The fact that it is a priority is bad enough …

The president is mistaken if he thinks this will tamp down anger. The extremists in the Catholic blogosphere will divide and go into different places. Some will refuse to believe their ears. Others will pink slip Doug Kmiec and Sam Brownback from the Church. Watch and see.

Meanwhile, anybody get a fund raising letter from Deal Hudson lately?

About these ads

About catholicsensibility

Todd and his family live in Ames, Iowa. He serves a Catholic parish of both Iowa State students and town residents.
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to FOCA Watch: Now We Can Close Our Eyes

  1. Liam says:

    Just for people to see the entire exchange:

    [Ed Henry, CNN White House Reporter-] Q: Thank you, Mr. President. In a couple of weeks, you’re going to be giving the commencement at Notre Dame. And, as you know, this has caused a lot of controversy among Catholics who are opposed to your position on abortion.
    As a candidate, you vowed that one of the very things you wanted to do was sign the Freedom of Choice Act, which, as you know, would eliminate federal, state and local restrictions on abortion. And at one point in the campaign when asked about abortion and life, you said that it was above — quote, above my pay grade.
    Now that you’ve been president for 100 days, obviously, your pay grade is a little higher than when you were a senator.
    Do you still hope that Congress quickly sends you the Freedom of Choice Act so you can sign it?
    OBAMA: You know, the — my view on — on abortion, I think, has been very consistent. I think abortion is a moral issue and an ethical issue.
    I think that those who are pro-choice make a mistake when they — if they suggest — and I don’t want to create straw men here, but I think there are some who suggest that this is simply an issue about women’s freedom and that there’s no other considerations. I think, look, this is an issue that people have to wrestle with and families and individual women have to wrestle with.
    The reason I’m pro-choice is because I don’t think women take that — that position casually. I think that they struggle with these decisions each and every day. And I think they are in a better position to make these decisions ultimately than members of Congress or a president of the United States, in consultation with their families, with their doctors, with their clergy.
    So — so that has been my consistent position. The other thing that I said consistently during the campaign is I would like to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies that result in women feeling compelled to get an abortion, or at least considering getting an abortion, particularly if we can reduce the number of teen pregnancies, which has started to spike up again.
    And so I’ve got a task force within the Domestic Policy Council in the West Wing of the White House that is working with groups both in the pro-choice camp and in the pro-life camp, to see if we can arrive at some consensus on that.
    Now, the Freedom of Choice Act is not highest legislative priority. I believe that women should have the right to choose. But I think that the most important thing we can do to tamp down some of the anger surrounding this issue is to focus on those areas that we can agree on. And that’s — that’s where I’m going to focus.

  2. Cautious Man says:

    I don’t know if that will close the book on FOCA talk. Just this past Sunday, my parish had a communion breakfast where the speaker was the director of the Evangelization Office for the diocese. Her talk was on the importance of evangelization (naturally), but the reason given was because of the “threats” to our religious freedom. She endorsed the National Organization for Marriage ad, and included FOCA in the list of current “threats”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s