Friday, June 15th, 2012


The American women religious weren’t too impressed the the CDF investigation of LCWR. How did they put it?

(T)he assessment was based on unsubstantiated accusations and the result of a flawed process that lacked transparency.

CNS reported today that four of Cardinal Dolan’s episcopal brothers across the Atlantic weren’t too impressed with his investigation of Irish seminaries:

(A preliminary report) contained some serious errors of fact, including named individuals. Attentive to the importance of applying due process, and respecting the rights of those named in this initial report, the trustees made a detailed and considered response to the Holy See.

The Irish Times piece quoted the bishops as refering to the errors not as “serious”, but “significant.” More from that report:

A disturbingly significant number of seminarians gave a negative assessment of the atmosphere of the house.

(Staff were) critical about any emphasis on Rome, tradition, the magisterium, piety or assertive orthodoxy, while the students are enthusiastic about these features.

“A change in the staff was recommended,” cites the article. Well of course it was. Seminarians trend to being more conservative than their teachers. That seems to be a source of discontentment. The suggested solution is interesting, in that it would seem to minimize truth-telling. If indeed we accept the role of bishops and theologians as knowing better than students.

Elsewhere the report said: “The apostolic visitor noted, and heard from students, an ‘anti-ecclesial bias’ in theological formation.”

Cardinal Dolan did comment:

While obviously others do not consider themselves bound by the promised confidentiality — so necessary and understandable to assure a fair and honest gathering of information (and) requested by the Apostolic See — I certainly do.

Apparently all those discussions on having a USCCB spokesperson have gotten to the Jovial One. Is that a bit of snark directed toward some brother bishops?

I wasn’t privy to the details of this report. So I don’t have an oar in this river. Do you suppose the Irish bishops’ protest will be heard with more consideration than that of the Tuesday delegation to Cardinal Levada? Stay tuned.

After anointing, the incense is brought out. The 2003 ICEL draft gives an interesting option that “if desired, a heap of incense mixed with thin candles is made on the altar.” What do you make of that option?

66. After the rite of anointing, a brazier for burning incense or aromatic gums. The bishop puts incense into the brazier, saying: 

Lord,
may our prayer ascend as incense in your sight.
As this building is filled with fragrance,
so may your Church fill the world

with the fragrance of Christ.

67. Then the bishop puts incense into some censers and incenses the altar; he returns to the chair, is incensed, and then sits. Ministers, walking through the church, incense the people and the walls.

68. Meanwhile, one of the following antiphons is sung with Psalm 138: 

An Angel stood by the altar in the temple, holding a golden censer. 

Or: 

From the hand of the angel, clouds of incense rose in the presence of the Lord. 

Another appropriate song is sung.

This completes the second of three major signs after the dedication prayer. After anointing and incense, we will come to the lighting of the church in tomorrow’s post.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 98 other followers