Friday, August 24th, 2012


This Fall’s Synod on the new evangelization is the latest in a long line of gatherings of bishops, of which the 1974 meet was just the third of the post-conciliar era.

In the face of “uncertainty and confusion,” Pope Paul is hoping for an infusion of “love, zeal, and joy” (EN 1) as the task of evangelization in the modern world is renewed:

2. This is precisely what we wish to do here, at the end of this Holy Year during which the Church, “striving to proclaim the Gospel to all people,”[Cf. Ad Gentes 1] has had the single aim of fulfilling her duty of being the messenger of the Good News of Jesus Christ – the Good News proclaimed through two fundamental commands: “Put on the new self”[ Cf. Eph 4:24, 2:15; Col 3:10; Gal 3:27; Rom 13:114; 2 Cor 5:17] and “Be reconciled to God.”[ 2 Cor 5:20]

Fundamentally Pauline.

We wish to do so on this tenth anniversary of the closing of the Second Vatican Council, the objectives of which are definitively summed up in this single one: to make the Church of the twentieth century ever better fitted for proclaiming the Gospel to the people of the twentieth century.

A reminder this is about reform and renewal of the people who bring the message. That seems an important distinction, perhaps lost somewhat as the Church has lurched in some quarters to a celebrity culture. I suspect the pope and bishops of the 1970′s were considering less the possibility of specialists in the episcopacy, but rather a broad enlivening across the board. That begs the question: is the pope the ideal person to write a synod summary? Was Paul VI the right man to do it for 1974-75?

We wish to do so one year after the Third General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, which as is well known, was devoted to evangelization; and we do so all the more willingly because it has been asked of us by the Synod Fathers themselves. In fact, at the end of that memorable Assembly, the Fathers decided to remit to the Pastor of the universal Church, with great trust and simplicity, the fruits of all their labors, stating that they awaited from him a fresh forward impulse, capable of creating within a Church still more firmly rooted in the undying power and strength of Pentecost a new period of evangelization.[ Cf. Paul VI, Address for the closing of the Third General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops (26 October 1974): AAS 66 (19740, PP. 634-635, 637]

So Paul VI tells us why it’s his pen. In the weeks ahead, we’ll see how well that charge was executed.

Comments?

First principle: harmony with law and an eye to serve the liturgy. Where does one find thay legal guidance? The GIRM, the RDCA, the rites and also canon law.

§ 28 §

1. The church building is designed in harmony with church laws and serves the needs of the liturgy. The liturgical books are the foundational source for those who wish to plan a building well suited for the liturgy. First among these are the prescriptions contained in the fifth chapter of the General Instruction of the Roman Missal and the norms in the introduction to the Rite of Dedication of a Church and an Altar. Other directives can be found in the various liturgical books and the Code of Canon Law.

Architects and pastors should be familiar with all these documents where they can be applied to the “geography” of the rites.

The bulleting is my edit here, but the text is unchanged:

§ 29 § Because the church is

  • a house of prayer in which the Eucharist is celebrated and the Blessed Sacrament is reserved,
  • a place where the faithful assemble,
  • and a setting where Christ is worshiped,

it should be

  • worthy of prayer and sacred celebration,
  • built in conformity with the laws of the Church,
  • and dignified with noble beauty and intrinsically excellent art. (CCC 1179; Presbyterorum Ordinis 5; cf. SC 122-127; GIRM 288)

The general plan of the building

  • reflects the Church that Christ gathers there,
  • is expressive of its prayer,
  • fosters the members’ participation in sacred realities,
  • and supports the solemn character of the sacred liturgy.

But there’s an addition in BLS 30:

§ 30 § The general plan of the building should be such that “in some way it conveys the image of the gathered assembly. It should also allow the participants to take the place most appropriate to them and assist all to carry out their function properly.”(RDCA II, 3)

BLS writers stick pretty close to the official line, as you see from the reference notes. Liam commented yesterday that there are not a lot of specifics to get us to the ideal. Much is left to a local interpretation, to whomever has the strgoner and more convincing approach between the local bishop, the pastor, the hired professionals, or the parishioners.

All texts from Built of Living Stones are copyright © 2000, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 97 other followers