Posted by catholicsensibility under
bishops [12] Comments
Archbishop Charles Chaput’s Los Angeles Prayer Breakfast address got headlines today at CNS. I would have liked to see the whole text. “debris of failure” is the working quote near the headline. Lacking that, I’d like to zero in on two quotes:
Morally, we live in chaotic times. In such a climate, it’s very easy for people to develop habits that undermine virtue, character and moral judgment. It’s hard to reach a moral consensus when a culture can’t agree on even the most basic standards of right and wrong. As a result, for individuals, today’s conditions of daily life are often isolating and even frightening.
The archbishop is referring to the American substrate in which we live, but I think it might apply equally to the institutional Church and its clergy. Leaving aside the sex abusers in the clergy who transgressed for any number of reasons–addiction, compulsion, power, or some other psychological reason–I think we can see broad evidence that our bishops have developed many bad habits. Where to start? What about a curia out of control with intrigue? Bishops as targets of leaks and disrespect from within their own ranks. Financial mismanagement leading to internaitonal investigations. Secret assessments and bishops deposed out of dioceses for the flimsiest of reasons–and those are the ones we know about. Lots of bishops are grounded for reasons unknown. And it’s all for our good–if we only knew, we would be scandalized. So they say. But I don’t trust nearly any of them.
Bishops themselves can’t agree on right and wrong. Basic judgments that any half-baked parent would execute without delay or doubt. High profile bishops like Francis George, Bernard Law, and Anthony Bevilacqua dithered while sex abusers went free. It might be that bishops prior to JPII and his “reform” were just as bad–we simply don’t know too much. But we have seen many figures of that first JPII “generation” discredited. It’s almost as if doctrinal orthodoxy went hand-in-hand with the erosion of moral management.
And isolation? Isn’t that the life imposed on clergy from seminary graduation?
The clergy scandal of the past decade has … found too many American bishops guilty of failures in leadership that resulted in bitter suffering for innocent persons. As a bishop, I repent and apologize for that failure — and I commit myself as zealously as I can to do the work a good bishop must do, which is shepherding and protecting his people.
An empty repentance, unless he has committed particular sins as a bishop.
Ten years since the charter. We still have bishops misbehaving. Instead of telling us lay people how to pray, how to study, and what to forgive, I’d like the bishops to take their own examen a little more seriously. Maybe the USCCB needs to go on a directed retreat instead of holding a meeting in a hotel. Maybe individual bishops need to cut back on the jet-setting too. The cult of celebrity is another of those bad habits, perhaps. We don’t need 4,000 mini-JP2′s trotting the globe. Believe me: Raymond Burke is no Karol Woytyla. Doesn’t the LA archdiocese have a man or woman religious better acquainted with prayer than a politically-minded bishop? Unless the point is to draw a crowd for celebrity-worship.
These bishops still don’t get it.
The Easter fire is on a par with veneration on Good Friday and the reservation of the Eucharist on Holy Thursday, as a consideration for the liturgical year and how it impacts a building’s design:
§ 84 § In some circumstances parishes may be able to create a permanent place for lighting the Easter fire. In others, the rite may be conducted in the gathering area immediately outside the church. While safety is always an important consideration, a flame to “dispel the darkness and light up the night” is needed to achieve the full symbolism of the fire.”* In climates and circumstances where weather precludes lighting the fire outdoors, a more limited fire can be enkindled indoors with the proper accommodations for ventilation, for heat and smoke detectors, for local fire regulations, and for surrounding the space with non-combustible materials.
The note from the CDWDS’s Circular Letter Concerning the Preparation and Celebration of the Easter Feasts, no. 82: “Insofar as possible, a suitable place should be prepared outside the church for the blessing of the new fire, whose flames should be such that they genuinely dispel the darkness and light up the night.”
One pastor I knew was satisfied with an alcohol fire at the Church entrance. It wasn’t until the ntext pastor was assigned that I could budge that “tradition.” One parish I visited had a bronze “container/sculpture” that housed the wood for the Easter fire. It was placed on the edge of a courtyard outside the church. For a once-a-year event? a priest asked me. Yes. Even for just once a year–it’s that important.
All texts from Built of Living Stones are copyright © 2000, United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Inc. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Let’s get bakc on a daily schedule for Pope Paul VI’s apostolic exhortation following the 1974 synod on evangelization. Some of you may have been tapping your feet on the primarily Third World concerns of liberation these past several days. Now that we are nearly halfway through the document, we get to the “how-to” of the matter.
40. The obvious importance of the content of evangelization must not overshadow the importance of the ways and means.
This question of “how to evangelize” is permanently relevant, because the methods of evangelizing vary according to the different circumstances of time, place and culture, and because they thereby present a certain challenge to our capacity for discovery and adaptation.
On us particularly, the pastors of the Church, rests the responsibility for reshaping with boldness and wisdom, but in complete fidelity to the content of evangelization, the means that are most suitable and effective for communicating the Gospel message to the men and women of our times.
Let it suffice, in this meditation, to mention a number of methods which, for one reason or another, have a fundamental importance.
Fairly basic and logical:
The way to evangelize is always up for discussion, as the optimal means of communicating the Gospel will change depending on innumerable human factors of both the recipients and the communicators.
Bishops bear the primary responsibility for leadership, especially the assessment on how to reach people.
Other comments?