Why One, Not The Other Too?

Cardinal Mahony gets fussed at for planning to vote. What about Cardinal Rigali? Hardly a fuss has been raised about his participation.

While I’m certainly sympathetic to the feelings and aims of child-protection and anti-mismanagement Catholics, I’m not sure much is served by these guys not serving in the conclave. From Cardinal Mahony’s blog:

That means never rationalizing what is happening in our lives, never protesting misunderstandings, and never getting angry because of false accusations.

There are wild, angry people out there making false accusations, certainly. The Catholic Right, especially, seems particularly giddy to throw one of their own under the bus and call for the garb of prison orange. But what about justified and proven assertions? What happens when another person, perhaps someone we don’t like or don’t trust, makes an accusation we know in our heart to be true?

I’ve always found it strange this recent bishop talk about going to jail for religious freedom. No bishop, however, has been willing to go to jail for mismanaging sexual predators in their clergy. The usual route is plea agreements, probation, and reduced charges. No human being is totally innocent. And some bishops often repeat the meme that we laity have lost some or all of our sense of sin. If we each are unwilling to listen to that accusation then bishops and laity have indeed entered into a dialogue of the deaf. The onus is on the bishops. They’re the ones responsible.

About these ads

About catholicsensibility

Todd and his family live in Ames, Iowa. He serves a Catholic parish of both Iowa State students and town residents.
This entry was posted in bishops. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Why One, Not The Other Too?

  1. FrMichael says:

    “The Catholic Right, especially, seems particularly giddy to throw one of their own under the bus and call for the garb of prison orange.” Are you referring to Mahony? I’ve never known a conservative Catholic who considered Mahony “one of us.” On the contrary, he’s the most successive semi-progressive Catholic bishop in wreckovating his diocese in the state.

  2. Todd says:

    Roger Mahony is a JPII bishop through and through. You think he’s progressive? Ha! We don’t want him. I haven’t considered him a progressive, except in the relative sense that the whole American episcopacy has lurched to the Right by appointment. It’s like calling a charcoal gray sheep white because it’s in a herd of black animals. Sure, it might have more light colored strands here and there …

  3. Jimmy Mac says:

    But now we have this: http://vaticaninsider.lastampa.it/en/inquiries-and-interviews/detail/articolo/los-angeles-mahony-gomez-conclave-22536/

    The old-boyz-network is hard to break, even after you have dissed a member.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s