One Way Ticket To Mars

Hold off the salivation of sending your favorite personality on this mission. I’m interested in your ethical commentary on this Jim McLane proposal I saw at Universe Today blogged by Nancy Atkinson last week. Speaking on the genesis of the idea, McLane said:

I noticed the cosmonaut seemed to be a slightly different type of person than the American astronaut. Cosmonauts are primarily pilots, and like test pilots, they are very focused on getting the job done. The current American astronauts are picked for things such as their speaking ability and social skills, and most of them have advanced degrees. But the cosmonaut struck me as an adventurous, get-things-done-type person, like our original astronauts back in the 1960’s.

“Get it done” is the motivation. McLane doesn’t want to fuss with a big crew, extra supplies, and the return mission. Send the astronaut up with what she or he will need. I suppose uncrewed robot ships could send more stuff.

Suicide? McLane says its logical.

There would be tremendous risk, yes, but I don’t think that’s guaranteed any more than you would say climbing a mountain alone is a suicide mission. People do dangerous things all the time, and this would be something really unique, to go to Mars. I don’t think there would be any shortage of people willing to volunteer for the mission. Lindbergh was someone who was willing to risk everything because it was worth it. I don’t think it will be hard to find another Lindbergh to go to Mars. That will be the easiest part of this whole program.

McLane’s right. Lots of people would sign up for this mission. Not me, however. From an ethical view, is a mission like this right?

About catholicsensibility

Todd lives in Minnesota, serving a Catholic parish as a lay minister.
This entry was posted in Astronomy. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to One Way Ticket To Mars

  1. Gavin says:

    Count me in, I’ll get to practicing on Orbiter. I had this idea before, but rather with deep-space exploration. Send someone to Pluto one-way with enough supplies for 25 years of space travel. And then work on making a craft fast enough to catch up with the guy.

    Really I don’t see a moral dilemma here, but I would tend to see such a mission as “we can land you here, and we’ll try to be back in 5-10 years for you with something that can go back to earth. Good luck surviving that long.” Where’s the heroism in letting fruit flies be the first terrestrial beings to see another planet? Eventually after the one-way trip, we’d be back. Don’t underestimate the human spirit for survival.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s