Pfleger’s Week Off

The Catholic blogosphere is all over the brief “leave” of Father Michael Pfleger and his return to ministry at his parish next Monday. I’ve noted a petition site to oust him “permanently,” and a lot of angry rhetoric directed toward his bishop, Cardinal George.

There’s so much commentary fodder here. Where to start?

Commenter Terry at InsideCatholic had a great remark:

Cardinal George did not just become Archbishop of Chicago. Faced with this very publicly difficult priest with an obvious cult of personality built up, he should have nurtured a relationship with him from the beginning, one based on honest assessments of the strength of his ministry and the flaws of it. Dine with the guy once a month – have good conversation, not mindless “affirmation” of his ministry.

This exposes a big part of the problem. Like many archdioceses, Chicago is too unwieldy in size for this to happen. Once a month meals would mean ninety priests, maximum, and that means no receptions or other sorts of meals for the archbishop.

I don’t know that bishops like Cardinal George avoid problems, but when your plate is too full, it’s not hard to imagine a busy bishop wishing challenges would just disappear.

We’ve talked about this suggestion here before: no diocese should be too large for a bishop to visit each parish for a few days every year. Thirty to fifty parishes would seem to be about right.

The charismatic priest is a problem for the Church, and more specifically for his parish. It’s great to work for a talented man, and bask in the glow. But the shadow side of that can really feed the ego of the pastor. If Father Pfleger left Saint Sabina’s permanently, do you think all the good things he began would continue? If you can say no, then I don’t think you can call the man’s ministry a success. When Jesus gave his example, it wasn’t about him; it was about those who would be sent to serve in his name. Ministry is about modeling Christ, not about being a new messiah for others.

The focus on Pfleger, especially in the insults directed at him and his bishop, are worse than the worst interpretation of the charismatic pastor. Catholics embarrass themselves (if not create their own scandal) focusing on the man’s missteps. It’s clear from browsing a few St Blog’s commentariats that the line has been crossed. It’s not pretty. And people shouldn’t kid themselves: there’s nothing faithful, orthodox, or charitable about much of what is being written.

Do you think Obama and McCain are going to get chummy with organized religion this Fall? I don’t see it. I don’t think they’ll dare.

About catholicsensibility

Todd lives in Minnesota, serving a Catholic parish as a lay minister.
This entry was posted in Church News, Ministry, The Blogosphere. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Pfleger’s Week Off

  1. Again, thanks Todd, for recognizing that insipid clericalism in its myriad forms and behavioral expressions is the problem, as opposed to “is he a good witch or a bad witch?”
    I’m on vacation; had a couple of long conversations with two old buddies who were musicians with my programs years ago and moved away. They can no longer see Christ at the helm of the barque, they see institutional men who cannot resist the human inclination towards achieving personal agendae at the wheel- the faithful, they see as Steinfels termed it, are “a people adrift.” My friends aren’t prejudiced or stupid; they’re honest and are very disaffected with both the petty and the monstrous examples of hypocracy that infests itself throughout the Body.
    The larger half of clergy I’ve known and worked with/for over nearly 4 decades, to a man, seem much more interested in creating their legacy, solidfying their reputations, being liked or simply being comfortable, than being even Christ-like.
    What the hell’s happening? Hell is happening.
    But we’ll still keep rowing, won’t we, despite all of that.

  2. Tony says:


    So clue me in, Todd, the good things that a man who incites racial hatred from the pulpit is doing.

    One thing that would help father Pfleger would be to celebrate Mass ad orientem, including his homilies. :P

  3. Gavin says:

    Tony I think the “blessed murmur” would be better for his sermons. Perhaps also ad orientem.

  4. Mike says:

    Tony, I’ve looked at your blog. You are a racist, and deserve hell. You are in no way a Christian, and are in no way a decent human being.

  5. Let’s avoid the personal attacks, please. The perception or even the fact that someone is a racist rarely deserves comment. The obvious is obvious enough and what is doubtful can stay that way.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s