These sorts of stories are distasteful, but they really should be thought out to their logical conclusion.

First, I have to laugh at the Pewsitter headline: Catholics Urge Archbishop Carlson To “Vote” No Communion if She Votes for Abortion Funding in Healthcare. She? Who’s she? Are they applying this pronoun to the Senate as well as to the Church these days? Oh yeah, my former senator.

Second, if Archbishop Carlson actually does come out with such an announcement pronto, would some interpret him as a lackey of Catholic politicos? And if so, can it really be called episcopal leadership? It would be like the sheep herding the shepherd.

And if Archbishop Carlson keeps any discussion with Senator McCaskill private, Catholic pro-lifers appear to be at odds with another bishop. Again. More scandal and dismay for the shock troops of the culture war.

Since when has the Church’s “penitential medicine” been subject to lobbying efforts by the faithful? Doesn’t strike me as being very traditional.

About catholicsensibility

Todd lives in the Pacific Northwest, serving a Catholic parish as a lay minister.
This entry was posted in Church News, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Lobbying

  1. Tony says:

    No, it isn’t really. I would never “lobby” a bishop to deny communion, nor would I be comfortable denying communion myself in a ministerial capacity.

    You have no idea if the person has repented and confessed the day before, and what if you deny them communion and they get hit by a car on the way out of church?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s