When I was a kid, and the neighborhood or schoolyard argument wasn’t going one’s way, a surefire escalation was to usher in one’s favorite team, one’s mother, or someone’s sexual activity–ion a negative light. Fisticuffs sometimes ensued. The blogosphere seems little different at its worst moments.

I have to say that in the ongoing Fr Stravinskas-Fr Ryan debate over the new Roman Missal, I was a little surprised to see this kind of argument surfaced by one of the chief players:

MANY of the original ICELites were known theological dissenters (e.g., birth control, ordination of women), which is one reason Liturgiam Autenticam (sic) required a total vetting of future members, with a nihil obstat. You will recall my first characteristic for a liturgical translator was one who subscribed to the Faith once received.

I can only imagine the reaction of my grad school profs if I tried to channel Karl Rove to tackle a troublesome theological point.

This casual libel passing as a theological discussion is evidence of a serious problem for the Church. It seems no less a danger to unity. And unity, let’s remember, is enshrined in the Creed. Not translation principles. Not even contraception or matters of priestly discipline.

But you’re not likely to see bishops or the pope address these “Galatian episodes” on the part of their overzealous watchdogs. More of a concern are the meanieheads in the secular press.

About catholicsensibility

Todd lives in Minnesota, serving a Catholic parish as a lay minister.
This entry was posted in Liturgy, The Blogosphere. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Surfacing

  1. Liam says:

    Well, now he’s whining that he can’t dialogue with commenters who come from an alien faith. The blame is all on us, he is blameless. Know that M.O. very well.

    I get that he has a pugilistic quality from his work in apologetics, but has he ever pastored a parish and, if so, for how long?

    The reason I ask is because his approach is of the cheerleading-for-my-side kind, rather than of the persuading-the-other-side kind. The latter is useful and fruitful. The former, not so much.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s