RNS Features Cleveland Parishioner

It’s too bad the headline speaks of a fight and a win, but if a contest between a bishop and a lay person must be spoken of as a conflict, it might be better for the lay person to come out a winner, since it seems to happen with depressing infrequency.

Religion News Service has a nice feature up today on Patricia Schulte-Singleton who pushed back against her parish’s forced closure, and got much of what she wanted: an independent inquiry by another bishop, and ultimately, a decree to reopen. Two aspects of this story struck me.

Saint Patrick Parish had 1,100 registered households when it was closed? That amazes me. Parishes smaller than that have thriving schools in my diocese. In Iowa, the threshhold for considering a closure is about one-eighth the number of parishioners. No wonder the Vatican was quick to reverse Bishop Lennon on these closures.

And a key to evangelization: orthopraxis trumps just about everything else when making an impression on people:

Schulte-Singleton started attending St. Patrick parish in 1990. Initially, she was not involved in parish activities, but an accident — one of her daughters lost two fingers from an exploding firecracker — changed that.

Schulte-Singleton said she was surprised by the outpouring of support from parishioners who brought food to her home and baby-sat her two other kids while she and her husband attended to their daughter in a hospital.

“That really showed what St. Pat’s was all about,” she said. “The parish became part of my family. And then I became really involved with the parish.”

About catholicsensibility

Todd lives in Minnesota, serving a Catholic parish as a lay minister.
This entry was posted in Church News, Commentary, evangelization, Other Places. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to RNS Features Cleveland Parishioner

  1. Liam says:

    In the Boston archdiocese, the threshold to avoid being clustered (oops, being included in new “pastoral service teams”) is weekend Mass attendance of 1,600 and annual collection in excess of $500,000.

  2. Todd says:

    Both a lower standard than Cleveland’s and also a less punitive penalty than being closed outright.

  3. Jimmy Mac says:

    But, fellas, above all we HAVE to preserve mandatory clerical celibacy. So what if we lose a few actively supported and supportive parishes? It’s a matter of principle, dontcha know?

    The pope has said it. You HAVE to believe it. That ends it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s