Archbishop Dolan’s LCWR Moment

Archbishop Dolan concedes he’s bothered by criticism of his invitation of the president to the Al Smith dinner. Mark Silk at RNS dismantles some of the giving-scandal concern.

My sense is that the word “scandal” has a particular meaning. In the theological and moral context, it does not mean “stuff I disagree with,” as defined by rabid pro-lifers and other ideologues. Professor Silk cites Thomas Aquinas and the Catholic tradition in suggesting that if a person is scandalized by another person’s good behavior, other moral qualities (such as envy) may be involved in the so-called scandalized. It seems that everybody needs to not only step back and take a deep breath, but conduct an examination of conscience.

On NPR earlier this summer, I recall Bishop Leonard Blair was bothered that Sr Pat Farrell and the LCWR declined to define themselves as pro-life in exactly the way the politicos want. This is sort of what’s happening to Archbishop Dolan here. He’s the LCWR. His pro-life critics are the CDF and Bishop Blair.

Perhaps it is possible for a person to embrace full moral goodness and live the anti-abortion message 24/7/365. At some point a certain radical standard cannot be met. Do political pro-lifers skip meals, decline to watch tv, get less sleep, refuse entertainment, and become hermits in order to further the cause? If someone is criticizing the Al Smith dinner, can other activities of pro-lifers be fair game? Things like walking the dog, sipping a coffee, taking a vacation, or sending one’s children to college? Because that’s where the logical approach will find this line of thought, when taken to extremes.

I feel badly that Archbishop Dolan is feeling the heat on this. But I’m not at all surprised. Anger has to go somewhere. And many of my otherwise fine brother and sister pro-lifers have allowed a basic good–the defense of human life–to color and cloud relationships. Not to mention obscure an even greater good than life. Faith itself.

I don’t feel badly, though, that the good archbishop is in good company with the Misunderstood. The LCWR likely would tell him to just take a number. His last word:

I’m encouraged by the example of Jesus, who was blistered by his critics for dining with those some considered sinners; and by the recognition that, if I only sat down with people who agreed with me, and I with them, or with those who were saints, I’d be taking all my meals alone.

I’d tell the man this is about more than being a solo foodie. This strikes at the very heart of the SCGS* movement. Divide and conquer, it seems to me, and an attempt to get 1.2 billion Churches of one. Good army slogan, perhaps. Less so for the cause of the Great Commission.

* Small Church, Getting Smaller


About catholicsensibility

Todd lives in the Pacific Northwest, serving a Catholic parish as a lay minister.
This entry was posted in Church News, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Archbishop Dolan’s LCWR Moment

  1. FrMichael says:

    I don’t feel bad that the Cardinal is getting heat: he made a terrible decision and then made a lousy response that convinced none of the doubters except the weak-minded who were looking for an excuse to support the Cardinal anyway. My own comment at the archdiocesan blog was censored, so obviously the number of “anti” comments has been artificially reduced by the Yes Men who surround Cardinal Cheesehead.

    Count me as a priest who never thought much of him. He’s been a cipher who has done little constructive since leaving PNAC. He did little to clean up the corruption left by the pervert Weakland in Milwaukee and has held his punches on this HHS mandate. Hell, one politician lied to me (the local congressman) and he’s been excluded from the parish premises and roundly criticized by me in venues public and private ever since. POTUS lied to the Archbishop of NY regarding protecting religious liberty and the Cardinal wants to yuck it up over jokes and cognac? It makes me sick.

    Three parishioners of mine have already eliminated health benefits for their workers that I know about because of the HHS mandate coming into effect this month. No doubt more will be coming.

  2. Todd says:

    “Three parishioners of mine have already eliminated health benefits for their workers …”

    And I’ll bet the Knights have yet to pony up an insurance plan. Alas.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s