Redemptionis Sacramentum 38

A brief section, but not a totally convincing one:

[38.] The constant teaching of the Church on the nature of the Eucharist not only as a meal, but also and pre-eminently as a Sacrifice, is therefore rightly understood to be one of the principal keys to the full participation of all the faithful in so great a Sacrament. [Cf. Ecclesia de Eucharistia 12-18; Dominicae Cenae 9] For when “stripped of its sacrificial meaning, the mystery is understood as if its meaning and importance were simply that of a fraternal banquet.[Cf. Ecclesia de Eucharistia 10]”

My sense is that “meal” doesn’t quite do justice to either the Eucharist or the people who promote a balance in how we look at the sacraments. It is undeniable that we believers need nourishment. Likewise that the traditional images of God feeding his people–both actually and metaphorically–are an essential part of our understanding of Christian faith.

I don’t think the CDWDS can get too fussy if it jealously limits the association of priesthood with holy orders, leaving the primary lay encounter with Christ to be one of nourishment and reception. The thought expressed in this section needs better balance.

About catholicsensibility

Todd lives in Minnesota, serving a Catholic parish as a lay minister.
This entry was posted in Redemptionis Sacramentum. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s