RIP Celebrities and Others

If you go by pop culture and one of its more visible facets, Facebook, 2016 was a bad year.  There is wonderment about the non-participation of Keith Richards (among others), and a wistful hope about the Kardashians (among others) joining the party. Even in the small pond of Catholic liturgical music, a tear or two has been shed.

But was 2016 so bad? Are we getting more famous people to mourn? Did boomer angst overshadow? An interesting analysis here. Barring global nuclear armageddon or a supervolcano blowing somewhere, can we expect 2017 to be worse? Check the link.

A few weeks ago a Facebook friend listed the names of a handful of American service personnel killed in the line of duty and how the media pays more attention to celebrities than people who have made a different kind of sacrifice. The media does do this. But I think the policy goes back before 2016. I believe the government chooses to minimize publicity on military deaths, fearing backlash like the late 60’s. Forever war is easier to swallow when its victims, domestic and abroad are nameless, faceless, and unmentioned.

My friend commented on my making political a post she hadn’t intended to set in that direction. But a lot of modern culture is politics. And not everything that gets hung on the media is totally deserved.

That said, most print and electronic media outlets still run obituaries. Many of them contain nuggets of stories of admirable lives lived. People make a difference all around us. Then they die. How do we honor that? I see lots of ways: taking time to attend a funeral, visits to cemeteries, preparing food for grieving friends, setting a date for a coffee or a beer. I see easy things: altering one’s social media gravatar or theme, linking an obit on a facebook page, or using an emoticon.

In the Christian tradition, our celebrities are saints. I think about the ways people are devoted to saints: they observe their feast days (usually the day of death), they read their writings, they might have a holy card or some remembrance, or they might model their life after the saint. That last bit could involve an association with a religious order, or a certain aspect of their lives. That takes commitment and imagination.

In the secular culture, do we see much of that? When an athlete dies, do his or her followers rededicate themselves in some way to their sport? When an actor, does a person volunteer for their community theatre? When a musician, to a musical group, be it a rock band, rap group, a community chorus, or something like that? That would be a lot tougher, wouldn’t it?

Otherwise, maybe I don’t mind that people are sad when a certain celebrity dies. I might not like the lifestyle, politics, sport, music, or media of a certain celebrity. But that doesn’t give me license to go Fred Phelps on someone else’s rainy day.

But I do offer a single question: When a famous, admired person dies, are we to pick up that legacy and advance it for the benefit of others, as we were once served? Or do we let it lie dropped on the ground, something to be lamented and not picked up for the next person to be inspired?

Advertisements

About catholicsensibility

Todd lives in the Pacific Northwest, serving a Catholic parish as a lay minister.
This entry was posted in Commentary. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to RIP Celebrities and Others

  1. Dick Martin says:

    Movie: ” Patriot Day”. Massachusetts = I think of most Catholic State. Boston= I think of most Catholic City. Catholics should be very upset with the Boston Portrayal of their police force.The most Catholic force in the Nation; or probably the World . The first 30 seconds of the Movie the use of the F— Word at least 20 Times and the entire movie 200 times. Was this Hollywood or was this the true portrayal of Boston Catholic Police ? Some one needs to be punished. Can’t blame the Church unless they are silent.

    • Todd says:

      Foul-mouth swearing is part of many western subcultures, including Hollywood. I found it less prevalent in the Midwest than back East. Far less common in churches than outside of them, but not unknown. Among believers, it certainly exists.

      I also think about the military, athletics, music, and even Scouting. My dad, a vet, and a guy with a full-range of expletives, expressed alarm at the quantity and creativity swearing in the latter when I was a boy. I very rarely indulge in it myself, but I don’t wince at it either, perhaps because of my Eastern upbringing.

      Punishment for swearing? Let’s break out the soap, the dunce cap, and the time-out corner. But seriously, aside from not using foul language oneself, I don’t think there’s much headway to be made, let alone hope to exact payment in some way.

      • Liam says:

        The F word is profanity. An abuse of the gift of speech. It is, however, not swearing (in the strict rather than casual sense) nor cursing (ditto). My parents were very old-fashioned Catholics: blasphemy and cursing were among the most serious offenses of the household, and consequently exceedingly rare. The D word (damn and its spiritual kith and kin) was worse than the F or other biological profanities. Profanity – while punished – was clearly distinguished as a medium-degree offense.

        In any event, what a confected concern with a Hollywood script that makes no pretense at being anything like a scholarly, journalistic or documentary re-creation. To raise it as an issue of purported historical reality illustrates the definition of a word I will refrain from using but will be obvious to anyone familiar with the pattern….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s