The Boston Seminary Report

I don’t know why I clicked this link nor why I carried on to read about two-thirds of the report on the investigation of St John’s Seminary in Massachusetts. On the whole it convinces me that seminaries are not the best way to form people for the ordained priesthood.

One thing that struck me was the rampant loneliness that stretched from rector to expelled seminarian and everybody in between. Certainly, a minister can draw from her or his loneliness and other wounds from time to time. But for a culture that attempts to emulate the cloistered monastic life, St John’s Seminary seems to fall far short. The descriptions of life seemed to have the worst of the college experiences: cheap beer, awkward attempts at romance (or a faked shadow of it), people-pleasing up and down the ladder. The thought of combining late adolescence with alcohol and loneliness strikes me as a recipe for disaster.

Seminary leadership was roundly criticized. When it was criticized from within the institution, offenders stayed put mostly, and whistleblowers were transferred. I found amusing the tale of the criticism of a faculty member who, in turn, brandished the silent treatment for one to six years, depending on to which person the interviewers spoke.

Another confirmation for me that candidates for ministry, ordained or lay, men or women, would probably do better in an open environment that involved these items:

  • Working for a living, at least 2/3rds time, and perhaps not as a church employee.
  • Serving in ministry in a parish or charity organization during formation, about fifteen-plus hours a week. Such experiences would include supervision of and by, and collaboration interaction with lay people and vowed religious.
  • Classwork in a university’s graduate school, preferably with a diversity of divinity students from different traditions, and of varied cultures and both sexes, obviously.
  • An eight-day directed retreat annually, and a thirty-day retreat at some point before graduation or ordination.
  • A spiritual director not associated with the place of learning or the parish served.
  • A small team of mentors, about three persons, to help the candidate learn to reflect on life experiences (spiritual as well as those pertaining to human development).
  • College graduate, and lacking a clear case otherwise, at least thirty years of age.

No bishop is ever going to ask for my input on these items. Seminary culture, good and bad aspects both, are too ingrained in Roman Catholicism for any of us to expect significant change before several decades pass.

About catholicsensibility

Todd lives in Minnesota, serving a Catholic parish as a lay minister.
This entry was posted in Church News and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to The Boston Seminary Report

  1. nassauny says:

    [b]A few times in the past decade a seminary has been accused by two seminarians who may be honest or may be disgruntled, but tend not to have back-up from their classmates. The story hits the fan, and the entire student body becomes suspect. That seems unfair. It’s like the press labeling some large universities party schools, while solid scholarship might exist in departments.

    On the other hand, Todd’s suggestions have strong validity. I’ll add one more. From oblique experience (being told as a layman to leave the room because of the discussion) that seminarians may learn more of church loopholes than the bishops would like the faithful to know. Sixty years ago, it was the lack of grave matter in eating one hot dog on Friday. Some bishops may not want the laity to learn what priests learn.[/b]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s