Conscientious Objection in the Constitution

My friend Lee writes on an alternate form of Amendment #2 that was considered in 1789:

The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed; a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country; but no person religiously scrupulous of bearing arms shall be compelled to render military service in person.

I found this discussion culled from the congressional record.

Two votes. If passed, I wonder how long it would stand? Quakers were a major religion in the late 18th century. We could have used more of their spirit as the United States grew and developed. Their Indian policy would have saved many tears.

About catholicsensibility

Todd lives in Minnesota, serving a Catholic parish as a lay minister.
This entry was posted in Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Conscientious Objection in the Constitution

  1. Liam says:

    Well, Indian policy was really revolutionized in the 1820s and 1830s by folks like Andrew Jackson and a host of land speculators in the old Southwest (and, to a somewhat lesser degree, the old Northwest). Revolutionized in the sense that the semi-pretence to law that obtained in the previous period was simply abandoned. King Cotton was the major fuel of this.

    Indian Removal was the precursor American protest cause to Abolition. And it was where American women activists cut their first teeth as a group.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s