about this site
Catholic Sensibility is a personal blog by a Catholic layperson with comments and occasional other writings by Catholics and non-Catholics. We make no particular claims to have the completeness of a Roman Catholic expression of Christianity. It contains opinion, interpretation, and personal musings. That’s it. Nothing official or authoritatively connected to the Magisterium.
-
Recent Posts
- Dignitas Infinita 43: Sexual Abuse
- Scripture in Late Eastertide: Ephesians 4:3-6
- Dignitas Infinita 41-42: Human Trafficking
- Spes Non Confundit 7: Signs of Hope
- Dignitas Infinita 40: Migrants
- Scripture in Late Eastertide: Galatians 5:16, 22-23a, 25
- Spes Non Confundit 6: Some Practical Notes on the Timetable
- Scripture in Late Eastertide: 1 Corinthians 6:19-20
- Dignitas Infinita 39: Jamais plus la Guerre!
- Scripture in Late Eastertide: 1 Corinthians 2:9b-10
Recent Comments
Pentecost and the re… on RCIA 41: Acceptance catholicsensibility on Spes Non Confundit 5b: Pi… liam0781 on Spes Non Confundit 5b: Pi… liam0781 on Spes Non Confundit 5a: A Journ… catholicsensibility on Slander in Question Dennis Knapp on Slander in Question Dennis Knapp on Slander in Question liam0781 on Slander in Question catholicsensibility on Slander in Question Dennis Knapp on Slander in Question Bible Readings
Vatican II pages
Categories
Blogroll
Contact
tf220870(at)gmail(dot)comArchives
Blog Stats
- 11,616,163 hits
Daily Archives: 18 June 2007
Eucharisticum Mysterium 20: Taking Care
The liturgy is about more than following rubrics. Liturgical leaders are to set an example, communicating the sense of the sacred. This is a sensible approach. Not every parish can afford the trappings of high-church liturgy. But the sense of … Continue reading
Supervenus at Gliese 581
This might be my week for the mantra “told ya” when it comes to planetary science. Space.com’s Ker Than reports that Gliese 581c, so well regarded as a possible abode for life, is now thought to be a steamy hellhole: … Continue reading
Posted in Astronomy
Leave a comment
Between Two Points
Maybe we need more. Zenit reports on various sociological studies supporting the case of marriage. There’s a lot of information in the link, none of it greatly surprising. However, when I see two arbitrary points taken, namely 1960 and 2000, … Continue reading →